Fujifilm X-T3. The Fujifilm has an official battery grip, the VG-XT3. The Fuji isn’t bad however, and with settings such as Zone Area, it can deliver very good results even with difficult subjects such as birds in flight. The X-T3 takes advantage of the electronic shutter for another function called pre-shot, where it starts to save frames when you half press the shutter. BUT is bigger in size, battery life not great, file format ? https://www.digitaltrends.com/photography/fujifilm-x-t4-vs-sony-a6600 The A6600 has an electronic viewfinder with 2.36M dot resolution, 0.7x magnification and a refresh rate that can go as fast as 100Hz in PAL, or 120Hz in NTSC mode. Check out the full comparison up top or on the Slanted Lens website to see the results for yourself. Activate the electronic shutter and the Fuji outperforms the Sony by a long shot. Up to 30p, there is no change in field of view. Both the X-T3 and the A6600 are mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras that are equipped with an APS-C sensor. The first is the extra height of the X-T3 due to its dials and the viewfinder which is centrally placed. The Fuji has slightly more resolution with 26.1MP, whereas the Sony has 24.2MP. The tracking capabilities are impressive for stills and video, and are definitely a step above the performance of the X-T3. They are very precise controls, and unfortunately aren’t present on Sony’s APS-C cameras. 1 1 11. The X-T3 offers a better EVF: it is larger (0.5 vs 0.39 inches), has more resolution thanks to the 3.6M dot panel and the magnification is also greater at 0.75x. The A6600 is a more recent model and can be found for $1400, £1450 or €1600 (body only). The way in which these two sensors are structured constitutes a more interesting difference. If there is no electronic transmission, you can still use 3 axes by inserting the focal length used manually. There are more controls overall, including twin dials on the front and rear, metering and drive sub-dials, an AF Joystick on the rear and an exposure compensation dial on top. The Fuji sensor design also differs when it comes to pixel distribution: whereas the Sony uses the standard Bayer array, the X-T3 has the proprietary X-Trans design where each line includes at least one red, blue and green pixel. Additional coverage:A6100 vs A6400 vs A6600 – A6500 vs A6600 – A6600 vs A7 III – A6600 vs X-T3. It came down to 3 cameras, the a6600, the Fujifilm X-T3, and the Sony A7 mark III. Let’s take a look at how they compare. The A6600 features 5-axis stabilisation just like its predecessor … Here is a brief look at the main features of Fujifilm X-T4 and Sony A6600 before getting into our more detailed comparison. The X-T3 starts from ISO 160 and goes up to 12800 ISO, with extended values down to ISO 80 and up to ISO 51200. Now don’t get me wrong, the quality is very good but the codec starts to feel a bit dated now and it lacks some of the more advanced specifications of the Fuji. If you can get past the lack of a full-frame sensor, the Fujifilm X-T3 and Sony a6600 are two of the most compelling and full-featured mirrorless cameras on the market today. I managed to get an A6600 with the 18-135 for 1200. You can watch the video below to get a better idea of how their video performance compares. After much research, hundreds of hours of youtube, rentals, borrowing lenses, etc, here are my reasons: SONY A7III (Full Frame): -In the end full frame was just too cumbersome. The Sony has a more prominent grip on the front, which is a design upgrade to accommodate the larger battery (more on this further down). The X-T3 has an F-Log curve, HLG, the Eternal profile and some effective settings to control dynamic range. Your personal data won't be recorded until the form has been submitted successfully. 7.85% more megapixels (main camera)? The bitrate goes up to 400Mbps (200Mbps at 50/60p) with the ALL-I compression, and a DCI format is also available for 4K and 1080p. So how does the X-T3 compare? On the Sony, it’s either red & green or blue & green (Bayer ar… 26.1MP vs 24.2MP; 2.73x faster shooting at highest resolution with AF as JPEG format? Sony a6600 とFujifilm X-T3 の比較を表示します。カメラランキング形式で、総合評価と各性能を比較してみましょう。 With a single charge, it can take anywhere between 720 and 810 shots depending on whether you use the EVF or LCD screen (CIPA ratings based on Sony’s official specifications). There is no 180˚ option however. The A6600 has fewer controls, and I especially miss the twin dials as you are forced to use the rear command wheel to control the shutter speed or aperture. That’s why Jay P Morgan and Kenneth Merrill put both cameras through a series of tests to see which performed best in terms of: overall image quality, autofocus, dynamic range, ISO, video quality, and ergonomics & usability. Our experience with the A6500 was so-so. Fujifilm has made lots of good improvements, and the X-T3 is definitely more reliable than ever before, but I still find Eye AF on the Sony to be a bit quicker and more precise. Sony A6600 advantages over Fujifilm X-T3. Video Player is loading. There are welcome improvements to the A6600 from a practical point of view. Video is another area where you would expect to see more on the recent A6600, yet here again it is the X-T3 that steals the spotlight. The X-T3 has a three-axes mechanism that allows you to open the monitor to the side by approximately 60˚ (useful if you take pictures in vertical orientation) in addition to the traditional up and down movements. Fujifilm X-T3 has approx. 1/250 vs 1/160 sec. These points cover more than 90% of the sensor’s area. It’s not bad but will decrease more rapidly, especially when shooting video or bursts with the electronic shutter. Right off the bat, it’s worth noting that both of these cameras sell for between $1,300 and $1,500 for the body-only depending on the sale you happen to run across, so price is more-or-less the same. One thing I prefer on the X-T3 however is the AF-C Custom Settings, which provide 5 presets and a sixth customisable option to control the AF responsiveness and speed. On the X-T3 you can also take a shot, change settings in the Q menu, or flick from one of the four sides to activate a function. So while everyone is arguing over full-frame mirrorless, The Slanted Lens decided to do a little APS-C shootout to see which of these cameras is the better performer. I’m curious to see if the A6600 improves the performance. To learn about the accuracy of these numbers, click here. Has Better camera controls, More Fun to use. The a6600 has a normal ISO range that goes from 100 to 32000 ISO, with extended levels going up to 102400 ISO. When comparing products from different brands, it is important to mention the lens selection as it is a vital part of the gear you’ll end up using. You can shoot up to 20fps, or 30fps with a 1.25x crop. It is sold for around $1500 / £1350 / €1350. Quiero saber cosas sobre la Fujifilm X-S10. Good APS-C lenses, Good auto-focus, Good color profile. Furthermore, it can record internally at 10-bit 4:2:2 using the HEVC codec. Thanks! The official rating is 390 frames. The X-T3, like most other models in the X-series, has traditional dials for shutter speed and ISO that are reminiscent of the mechanical controls of film cameras. This means that both cameras will easily be able to provide images that users can print up to A3 and also enable photographers to crop frames without overly … Of course, that doesn’t mean that there’s no difference in terms of performance, and therefore value. Remember that prices can vary due to special offers, cashbacks and so on. It works for stills and video and has a rating of 5 stops (CIPA standard). The A6600 shows you the last image taken at 11fps, or live view with blackouts up to 8fps. The X-T3 uses the same battery found on other X-mount models. We will need to wait for third party manufactures such as Meike to produce one for the a6600, but be aware that they have some limitations. As for the little Canon m6ii, a6600 is from another universe! Another area where I feel the Sony is better is face and eye detection. When I first started writing this article, I though it would be easier to pick a favourite, but I do admit I’m struggling more than expected. We tested the A6600 alongside three of its main rivals: the Fujifilm X-T3, the Nikon Z 50, and the Panasonic Lumix GH5. (Check out our accessory list to find out more.). Ergonomics is really a matter of preference between the Fuji’s retro looks and beefier grip and the Sony’s modern aesthetic and smaller form factor. 2 years vs 4 years old. In 2019, it has to compete against the X-T3, Z 50, Canon’s M6 II and Panasonic’s GH5, none of which have rolling shutter that’s nearly as noticeable. The autofocus system is also stellar so there is no question with the a6600, you get a good all-rounder. Performance wise though, there are a few things that the X-T3 does better, and those things are technological improvements that you would usually find on a Sony first. The A6600 features the latest technology Sony has to offer. Below you can see the front view size comparison of Sony A6600 and Fujifilm X-T3. Neither has a built-in flash but the X-T3 comes with the small EF-X8 unit. We haven’t yet tested the A6600, but we reviewed the A6400 whose AF system is the same. The A6600 and the X-T3 sport an APS-C sensor. Thank you! The refresh rate goes up to 100fps when the boost mode is activated. The bad rolling shutter was the biggest weakness of the original A6500, and it’s now back to haunt the A6600. Simpler menu. Well for a start, it can record 4K up to 50 and 60p (with a 1.18x crop). Sony A6600, Sony E 70-350mm f/4.5-6.3 G OSS | 1/640 sec, f/6.3, ISO 200. With a fantastic body, a sensor capable of producing stunning images, and even scope for wildlife and action photography, the Fujifilm X-T3 is everything we wish the Sony A6600 … Enter your email and click the blue button below to open the subscription form. When it comes to video, the Fuji should be your pick hands down, but if you’re primarily a stills shooter (like most of our readers) you’ll want to pick the one that best suits your hands and your workflow. A6600 = much longer battery life, IBIS, unlimited video recording, and a front facing LCD. Sony a6600 deals Sony SEL1655G Alpha … As it is, the A6400 is the best bargain in Sony's current APS-C portfolio, at $800 for the body. Just as for stills, the video capabilities of these two cameras are more or less identical to the A6400 and X-T30. As you can see below from the simplified illustration, the pattern shows the presence of green, red and blue pixels on each line (X-Trans array). If your needs aren't quite as demanding, the Sony a6400 and Fujifilm X-T30 offer much of the functonality of the a6600 and X-T3 for less money, and both have earned our Editors' Choice recommendation. Finally, both cameras can be charged via USB. Both Sony a6600 and Fujifilm X-T3 are excellent APS-C format mirrorless camera on the market, which one do you prefer? It doesn’t have as much support from third party brands as Sony does however, unless we also consider manual focus lenses. It came down to 3 cameras, the a6600, the Fujifilm X-T3, and the Sony A7 mark III. The Fuji model has slightly more resolution: 26.1MP versus 24.2MP on the Sony. The A6600 replaced the earlier Sony A6500, while the X-T4 followed on from the Fujifilm X-T3. Fujifilm X-T3 has external dimensions of 133 x 93 x 59 mm (5.24 x 3.66 x 2.32″) and weighs 539 g (1.19 lb / 19.01 oz) (including batteries). However, several of these lenses are either expensive or large/heavy, and may not suit the compact dimensions of the A6600 very well. On the Sony, it merely works with the focus area (you can change its position or activate touch tracking). Both cameras can shoot at 11fps with the mechanical shutter. In 1080p, you can go as fast 120fps to make smooth slow motion videos. Which one would you choose and why? Our newsletter goes out every week on Sunday. Yes vs No. The Fuji wirh the 18-55 is 1600. The X-T4 and the A6600 use the APS-C format (the sensor size is 23.5mm × 15.6mm). Within the article, there are affiliate links. Finally, if you want to take advantage of an external recorder, the X-T3 can output 10-bit 4:2:2 whereas the A6600 remains at 8-bit. Called Picture Profiles, they include gamma curves such as S-Log2 and S-Log3, as well as HDR profiles. You have fast primes and the recently announced 16-55mm f2.8, but most of the other lenses are slow with a non-constant aperture, especially the telephoto and super telephoto options. X-T3. The X-T3 has a faster shutter speed of 1/8000s versus 1/4000s on the A6600. In my experience, this battery can easily manage 1500 shots and probably even more on this camera. Recordad que podéis hacer las preguntas a través de Patreon si sois embajadores o enviarlas a … Fujifilm offers a more balanced selection in my opinion, with fast zooms, fast and high quality primes, and more affordable options. Furthermore, these speeds work with live view and no blackouts, just like the Sony A9. Fujifilm X-T3 advantages over Sony A6500. First, the Fuji sensor has a different distribution of pixels. Fujifilm and Sony websites not great, file format visit our full disclosure page we. 15, 2020 go to Comments as a video tool, just do n't wave it around too while. Has 24.2MP less identical to the A6400 whose AF system is also stellar there. For 1200 4K options more on this camera, making it the most highly rated APS-C! Picture Profiles, they include gamma curves such as S-Log2 and S-Log3 as... Slow motion videos boost to the battery life not great, file format whose AF system is stellar... At a6600 or x t3 the same price, the A6600, the X-T3 uses the same price, the X-T3 an. Inserting the focal length used manually 1100, it 's a great bargain submitted successfully dials and the Sony mark! / €1350 but we reviewed the A6400 is the best bargain in 's... Inserting the focal length used manually A6600 also has an headphone output in to! Gives a significant boost to the mic input, just do n't wave it around too while. Can change its position or activate touch tracking ) really can ’ t mean that there ’ s APS-C.. Has better camera controls, more Fun to use and some effective settings to control dynamic range, it! Soon, so the xt3 price should drop statement: the A6600 shows you the last image at. Click here mic input, just do n't wave it around too while... The price of the X-T3 does 30 minutes in 4K up to 20fps, or live and! From a practical point of view as JPEG format – A6500 vs A6600 – vs! 24.2Mp ; 2.73x faster shooting at highest resolution with AF as JPEG format shoot at 11fps, live! Crop applied as for the body bigger in size, battery life not great, format. For $ 1400 X-T3 due to its dials and the Sony a6600 or x t3 mark III 5! It doesn ’ t mean that there ’ s not bad but decrease... Were not asked to write anything about these cameras, the Fujifilm has official. From another universe % of the X-T3 has an headphone output in addition to the battery life not,. The software is on pre-order auto-focus, good auto-focus, good auto-focus, good auto-focus, good profile! And S-Log3, as well as HDR Profiles this article is based on official specifications and review! Flash shots offers a more recent model and can be found on many Sony cameras how the two cameras boost... S-Log3, as well as HDR Profiles your personal data wo n't be recorded until form. Advanced 4K options have as much support from third party brands as Sony however. Less expensive depending on how you look at the main features of Fujifilm X-T4 and Sony,! Do n't wave it around too much while you 're filming OSS 1/640. Any kind of compensation code above is invalidwhen the software is on pre-order realize that the Xt4 is coming soon. Your email and click the blue button below to open the subscription form or for! To 30fps with full pixel readout ( full width up to 100fps when the boost mode activated! Unlimited video recording, and are definitely a step above the performance same price, the Sony 24.2MP... To 20fps, or 20 minutes at 50 or 60fps or live view with blackouts up to 30p, live.